December 23, 2016
The United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 2334, which stated that Israeli settlements in Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, had no legal validity and constituted a flagrant violation under international law. The resolution was notable for the United States' decision to abstain from voting, allowing it to pass.
New York City, United States | United Nations Security Council
On December 23, 2016, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 2334, a significant and controversial resolution concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The resolution addressed the issue of Israeli settlements in Palestinian territories occupied since the 1967 Six-Day War, including East Jerusalem.
Legal Status of Settlements: The resolution reaffirmed that Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem, have no legal validity. It declared these settlements a “flagrant violation” of international law and a major obstacle to achieving a two-state solution and a just, lasting, and comprehensive peace.
Call for Action: The resolution called upon Israel to cease all settlement activities in the occupied territories. It also urged all states to distinguish, in their relevant dealings, between the territory of the State of Israel and the territories occupied since 1967.
Condemnation of Violence: The resolution condemned all acts of violence against civilians, including acts of terror, provocation, incitement, and destruction.
One of the most notable aspects of the adoption of Resolution 2334 was the United States’ decision to abstain from the vote. Traditionally, the U.S. has been a staunch ally of Israel and has often used its veto power to block resolutions critical of Israeli policies. However, in this instance, the U.S. abstained, allowing the resolution to pass with 14 votes in favor and none against.
Diplomatic Shift: The abstention marked a significant diplomatic shift in U.S. policy, reflecting the Obama administration’s frustration with continued Israeli settlement expansion, which it viewed as undermining peace efforts.
International Reactions: The resolution was met with mixed reactions. It was welcomed by many in the international community who viewed it as a reaffirmation of international law and a necessary step towards peace. Conversely, it was strongly criticized by the Israeli government, which rejected the resolution and accused the U.S. of abandoning its ally.
Impact on Peace Process: While the resolution was non-binding, it underscored the international consensus against settlement expansion and highlighted the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It also set the stage for future diplomatic efforts and discussions regarding the peace process.
The adoption of Resolution 2334 did not lead to immediate changes on the ground, as Israeli settlement activities continued. However, it remains a pivotal moment in the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, reflecting ongoing international concerns and the challenges of achieving a negotiated peace settlement. The resolution continues to be referenced in discussions about the legality and future of Israeli settlements in the occupied territories.
Source: www.un.org