June 21, 1982

John Hinckley Jr. was found not guilty by reason of insanity for the attempted assassination of U.S. President Ronald Reagan.


Washington, D.C., United States | United States Judicial System

Watercolor painting based depiction of John Hinckley Jr. was found not guilty by reason of insanity for the attempted assassination of U.S. President Ronald Reagan. (1982)

John Hinckley Jr. Found Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity

On June 21, 1982, John Hinckley Jr. was found not guilty by reason of insanity for the attempted assassination of U.S. President Ronald Reagan. This verdict followed a high-profile trial that captivated the nation and had significant implications for the American legal system.

Background

On March 30, 1981, John Hinckley Jr. attempted to assassinate President Ronald Reagan outside the Washington Hilton Hotel in Washington, D.C. Hinckley fired six shots, injuring Reagan, Press Secretary James Brady, Secret Service agent Tim McCarthy, and police officer Thomas Delahanty. Reagan suffered a punctured lung but recovered after surgery. James Brady, however, sustained a severe head injury that left him permanently disabled.

Hinckley’s motive was reportedly an obsession with actress Jodie Foster, whom he sought to impress by carrying out the assassination.

The Trial

Hinckley’s trial began on May 4, 1982, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The defense argued that Hinckley was suffering from acute psychosis and was unable to understand the wrongfulness of his actions. The prosecution contended that Hinckley was aware of his actions and their consequences.

The trial included extensive psychiatric testimony from both sides. The defense’s case was bolstered by evidence of Hinckley’s long history of mental illness, including depression and delusional thoughts.

Verdict and Aftermath

The jury reached a verdict on June 21, 1982, finding Hinckley not guilty by reason of insanity. This decision was met with widespread public outrage and led to significant changes in the legal standards for insanity defenses in the United States.

  • Insanity Defense Reform: The verdict prompted Congress and several states to revise laws regarding the insanity defense. The Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 was enacted, making it more difficult to obtain a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity in federal cases.

  • Public Reaction: The decision sparked debate over the adequacy of the legal system in dealing with mentally ill offenders and raised questions about public safety and justice.

  • James Brady’s Advocacy: In the aftermath, James Brady and his wife, Sarah, became prominent advocates for gun control, leading to the passage of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act in 1993.

Conclusion

The trial and verdict of John Hinckley Jr. remain a pivotal moment in American legal history, highlighting the complexities of the insanity defense and its implications for both the legal system and public policy. Hinckley was committed to St. Elizabeths Hospital in Washington, D.C., and was released from institutional psychiatric care in 2016 under strict conditions.

Source: www.history.com