November 29, 1950

The United Nations General Assembly passes Resolution 383, which calls for a ceasefire and withdrawal of Chinese and North Korean forces from the Korean Peninsula.


New York City, United States | United Nations

Watercolor painting based depiction of The United Nations General Assembly passes Resolution 383, which calls for a ceasefire and withdrawal of Chinese and North Korean forces from the Korean Peninsula. (1950)

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 383

On November 29, 1950, the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 383, reflecting international attempts to address the escalating conflict on the Korean Peninsula during the Korean War. The resolution called for a ceasefire and the immediate withdrawal of Chinese and North Korean forces from South Korea.

Context Leading to Resolution 383

  • The Korean War: The conflict began on June 25, 1950, when North Korean forces, backed by the Soviet Union and later China, invaded South Korea. In response, United Nations forces, led by the United States, intervened to support South Korea.

  • Chinese Intervention: As UN forces advanced toward the Yalu River, which borders China, the Chinese People’s Volunteer Army entered the conflict in October 1950, changing the war’s dynamics and leading to significant battles like the Battle of Chosin Reservoir.

The Resolution

Resolution 383 was part of the UN’s efforts to produce a peaceful resolution to the conflict. It explicitly demanded:

  • Ceasefire: An immediate cessation of hostilities by all parties involved in the conflict.
  • Withdrawal: The resolution called specifically for Chinese and North Korean forces to withdraw from South Korean territory.
  • Peaceful Resolution: It urged all parties to seek a political solution to the war through negotiations, emphasizing the role of the UN in facilitating these efforts.

Significance and Aftermath

  • Diplomatic Pressure: The resolution exerted international pressure on Chinese and North Korean forces to pull back, aiming to prevent further escalation and potential for global conflict.

  • Continued Conflict: Despite the resolution, the war continued until the armistice in 1953. The situation on the ground did not immediately change, as battles continued even after the passing of Resolution 383.

  • Influence on UN Policies: The resolution demonstrated the challenges the United Nations faced in enforcing peace and the limitations of its resolutions during deteriorating global situations characterized by the Cold War tensions.

Resolution 383 illustrates the international community’s attempts to reestablish peace on the Korean Peninsula amidst the complex political and military dynamics of the early Cold War era. It underscored the UN’s commitment to maintaining international peace and security, even as it faced significant limitations in enforcing such resolutions.

Source: www.un.org